|
|
|
Pollution disturbs precipitation patterns
In summer, weaker winds move the clouds more
slowly. Heat absorbed by the city and pollution's
interference with raindrop formation interact to
cause the clouds to intensify before producing
precipitation. The onset of rainfall from a cloud
leads eventually to its demise by cooling off the
air near the ground. The air pollution delays the
onset of precipitation, so that the intense storm
clouds can build higher and larger before they start
precipitating and subsequently dissipating. Recent
studies suggest that rainfall patterns have changed
in regions downwind of Houston from a period of
pre-urban growth to a post-urban growth period.
Other studies have observed areas of enhanced
lightning flashes downwind of Houston. |
Click to animate |
|
|
|
|
|
Project Objectives |
|
The
Houston Environmental Aerosol Thunderstorm Project
(HEAT) is designed to address the factors responsible
for the observed enhancement in lightning frequency
over Houston, TX. An array of surface and airborne
equipment were operated during this study to
characterize the thermodynamic, environmental, and
cloud properties of the atmosphere within and outside
of the urban area. It has been speculated that
enhanced aerosol concentrations arising from urban
emissions suppress precipitation and deepen the mixed
layer within urban clouds, which may alter cloud
electrification, and possibly increase lightning
frequency. To address the merit of this hypothesis for
the Houston region, detailed measurements of aerosol
and cloud properties were necessary. Measurements were
conducted onboard the SOAR research aircraft with
complementary surface measurements of aerosol and
cloud properties throughout the approximately 6-week
intensive field program. Nearly identical
instrumentation suites were used on the SOAR Cheyenne
II and at the 275 m Williams Tower on the west side of
Houston, to characterize size distributions,
size-resolved hygroscopic growth, and cloud activation
efficiency of the aerosol. The SOAR research aircraft
was equipped with multiple wing probes for direct
measurement of cloud droplet size distributions. |
|
The
primary goal of the Houston Environmental Aerosol
Thunderstorm (HEAT) project is to examine the sources
and causes of a 50% enhancement of cloud-to-ground
lightning discharges over Houston, Texas. Comparable
lightning enhancement has been observed also over Lake
Charles, Louisiana. Reaching this goal will involve
quantification of the effects of pollution, the urban
heat island, and the complex coastline on storms and
lightning characteristics in the Houston area.
The SOAR and TAMU research team designed flight
patterns to accomplish three primary objectives: |
1. |
Provide additional detail of the properties of the
aerosol entering cloud base, and the size distribution
of cloud droplets in the liquid phase region of target
clouds. |
2. |
Through flights extending beyond the Houston urban
area, statistically characterize the differences
between CCN spectra within and outside of Houston. |
3. |
Provide a link with the ground-based measurements by
flying spirals over the surface site. |
|
|
Instrumentation during SPECTRA |
Airborne measurements from the SOAR research aircraft
provided the necessary spatial coverage of the study
region as well as the direct in situ measurements of
cloud properties. To assess the degree to which the
aerosol and CCN properties during flight times are
representative of the region, complementary
measurements were made continuously at the surface
site at the 275 m Williams Tower on the west side of
Houston. A room on the 59th floor of that building was
used for sampling during this campaign. A ground-based
version of the DMA/TDMA system operated on board the
Cheyenne was used to characterize submicron aerosol
size distributions and size-resolved hygroscopic
growth. The size distribution of supermicron particles
was measured using a TSI, Inc. Model 3321 Aerodynamic
Particle Sizer (APS). Direct measurements of CCN
concentration at a single supersaturation were
measured with the same model DMT counter as that used
on board the Cheyenne. Whereas the TDMA and CCN
counter were operated in parallel on the Cheyenne to
maximize time resolution, they were intermittently
operated in series at the surface site to examine the
relationship between particle size, hygroscopic
behavior, and activation efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|