|
Analysis |
|
The
accomplishments in addressing Objective 1 include: |
-
Documentation of the
regional aerosols, including pollutants from urban and
industrial sources, and the effects of these aerosols
on cloud structure and behavior.
-
Demonstration that CCN
aerosols, on which cloud droplets form, constitute
about 10% of the overall regional atmospheric aerosols
-
Documentation that the
Sierra Nevada often receives precipitation from
shallow pristine clouds as long as they do not ingest
pollutants from the atmospheric boundary layer.
-
Demonstration that high
concentrations of tiny CCN aerosols inhibit
precipitation when they are ingested from the boundary
layer due to either convective transport or orographic
lift.
|
The
accomplishments in addressing Objective 2 include the
following: |
-
Validation of the
satellite inferences of cloud microstructure using the
in-cloud measurements from the cloud physics aircraft
on two days of measurement (February 7 and March 4,
2005).
-
Verification that
pollution aerosols are instrumental in altering the
internal structure of the clouds and their resultant
precipitation.
The use of the cloud physics aircraft has made
possible the documentation of dramatic differences in
cloud microstructure associated with differences in
CCN, measured by the airborne CCN counter that were
visibly related to air pollution. It was determined
further that these differences were related to the
satellite retrievals, which were validated by the
aircraft measurements. Pollution is certainly
affecting Sierra clouds and precipitation
detrimentally. Through the aircraft and satellite
measurements in SUPRECIP it has been noted that much
of the Sierra precipitation was produced by
surprisingly shallow pristine clouds. This suggests
that pollution will act detrimentally on such clouds
and may help explain the long-term losses in Sierra
orographic precipitation.
|
|
|
|